Educational Technology Plan

 

2003-2006

 

 

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLENDALE

 

Unified School District

 Superintendent

James R. Brown

  

Board of Education

Chakib Sambar, Pam Ellis, Greg Krikorian,

Lina Harper, Mary Boger,

Anna Arutyunyan  (Student Member)

 

“The Glendale Unified School District does not discriminate with regard to sex, race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry/ethnicity, marital or parental status, age, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or any other unlawful consideration.” 

GUSD Board Policy # 4030


 

Table of Contents

 

 

1.  INTRODUCTION

             District Challenges

             Educational Technology Initiatives

             Rationale

             Plan Duration and Modification

 2.  STAKEHOLDERS

 3.  CURRICULUM

             a.         Current Technology Access

             b.         Technology Use

             c.         Curricular Goals and Content Standards

             d.         Goals for using technology to improve teaching and learning by supporting the district curriculum

 e.         Technology and Information Literacy Skills

 f.          Technology Access

 g.         Student Record Keeping

 h.         Goals and Implementation Plan To Make Teachers and Administrators More Accessible to Parents

 i.          List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities

 j.          Process To Monitor Benchmarks And Timeline

 4.  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

             a.         Current Skills and Needs

             b.         Professional Development Goals

             c.         List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities

 d.         Process To Monitor Benchmarks And Timeline

 5.  INFRASTRUCTURE

             a.         Needs Assessment

             b.         Inventory

             c.         List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities

 d.         Process To Monitor Benchmarks and Timeline 

 6.  FUNDING AND BUDGET

             a.         Established and Potential Funding Resources

             b.         Estimated Implementation Costs

             c.         Ongoing Technical Support

             d.         Replacement Policy

             e.         Monitoring and Modification

 7.  MONITORING AND EVALUATION

             a.         How Technology Impact will be Evaluated

             b.         Timeline/Evaluation Schedule

 8.  ADULT LITERACY COLLABORATION

 9.  RESEARCH-BASED METHODS AND STRATEGIES

             a.         Strategies for Student Learning with Technology

             b.         Strategies for Teaching with Technology

             c.         Strategies for Management with Technology

10.  APPENDICES

            Appendix A – Glendale Unified School District Network

            Appendix B – Administrative Regulation AR 0440

            Appendix C – Board Policy BP 0440 District Technology and Planning

            Appendix D – Proposed Configurations for Schools

            Appendix E – Enhancing Education Through Technology        

 


 

  

1.  INTRODUCTION

 

The Glendale Unified School District (GUSD) is comprised of twenty elementary schools grades k-6, four middle schools grades 7-8 and three comprehensive high schools grades 9-12, a magnet high school, one continuation high school, a developmental center for multi-disabled students and numerous centers serving pre-school or school-age children.  The current enrollment is approximately 30,000 students.  These students reside within the city of Glendale, a small portion of the city of La Canada Flintridge and the unincorporated Los Angeles County community of La Crescenta.  In 2002, Glendale was the third largest district in the county and in the top 30 in size in California.  The District is one of the largest employers in the community with more than 3000 teachers, administrators and support staff on the education team.  The annual operating budget is over $200 million with about 90% of the income allocated by the state of California.  More than fifty percent of the schools have achieved major awards of excellence from the State Department of Education or the United States Office of Education. 

 

Glendale schools are fortunate to have strong and long lasting partnerships with many segments of the community all of whom have been or will be involved at some level in the GUSD technology planning and implementation process. These partnerships include a host of organizations and companies including: California School Employees Association; Glendale Teachers Association; Glendale Unified School District Foundation Consortium; Parent-Teacher Associations (26); City of Glendale; Crescenta Valley Town Counsel; Foothills and Glendale Board of Realtors; Glendale Crescenta Valley and Montrose/Verdugo City Chambers of Commerce; Rotary Club; Lions Club; Kiwanis; Masons; YWCA; YMCA; AAUW; Assistance League; the Armenian Chamber of Commerce; the Filipino Business and Professional Association; Hispanic Business and Professional Association; Economic Alliance of the San Fernando Valley; Committee of Armenian Parents of Public School Students; Superintendent’s Advisory Council; GATE Advisory Council; Healthier Community Coalition; Glendale Arts Network; Glendale Community Foundation; Nestle Corporation; Walt Disney Studios; Washington Mutual; J.C. Penney Company and the Glendale School Management Association.

 

District Challenges

 

The Glendale Unified School District like many districts in the state of California faces the challenge of attaining high student achievement with limited budget allocations due to a California State Budget crisis and a diverse student population.  Despite this challenge Glendale schools are highly competitive and recognized state wide as well as nationally for the innovative ways in which they challenge students academically while meeting specialized needs.  Glendale schools have been highly successful on the California State Academic Performance index with 22 of the 28 schools meeting their school wide target in 2002.  This academic growth occurred even with the District having a high percentage of students needing English Language Development (ELD) support.  Glendale has one of the highest percentages of multi-family dwelling units of any city in California.  This housing factor and the fact that over 60 different languages are spoken in the District makes the high level of achievement even more impressive.  The District believes strongly that through the effective use of technology in its schools, these challenges will be met and overcome and that maximum student achievement will be realized.

 

Educational Technology Initiatives

 

The education technology planning process currently in place began with the vision of the Board of Education in November 1995.  The district began its quest to create broad-based technology initiatives by asking the following key questions:

 

·        How can we create a technology plan that will focus on identified instructional needs and objectives while constructing an effective infrastructure for the district?

·        Should we separate plans for the technology infrastructure, the business applications and the instructional mission?

·        How do we assure adequate funding for the technology mission for schools and instruction for the long term?

·        How can the plan promote district baseline expectations with regard to instructional technology without discouraging school site initiative?

·        How can the plan address “total cost of ownership” (TCO) as it affects infrastructure?

·        Should the plan support a minimum level of hardware and software?

·        How can the plan more clearly define how e-rate and other specialized funding drives technology development?

·        How can the plan address: “where are we,” “where do we need to go,” “how will we get there,” and “how will we know when we have arrived?”

 

The first planning team submitted a technology master plan for the district clearly focused on curriculum in April 1996. After a lengthy process, which began in 1995 and intensified in 1997 when the planning process for the Clark Magnet High School began the seeds of the new technology infrastructure and plan were realized.  The intent was to continually modify the plan to assure that students in GUSD always received optimum access to teaching and learning technologies. 

 

In 1998 the first revision of the technology master plan was drafted continuing to support instruction and curriculum but adding significant infrastructure information leading to the development of that aspect of the program.  Following the drafting of this plan the district reorganized its technology support structure combining the legacy information systems department with the 2-year-old educational technology service department. Following the Board of Education meetings of July 17 and October 16, 2001, an Educational Technology Advisory Committee was proposed, and then established for the purpose of reviewing the District’s Technology Plan and making recommendations to the Board of Education regarding the direction of technology in the District including a new technology plan. The Board formally established the Committee in October 2001 to review the District’s “Local Technology Plan” with focus on the following areas:

 

·        Relationship to the Glendale Schools 2005 Strategic Plan

·        Effectiveness in the application of technology to assist in the delivery of instruction

·        Professional/staff development components in relation to educational and support service operational needs

·        Assessment of existing infrastructure, hardware, technical support, network, software, etc.

·        Assessment of resources devoted to the support of the plan (funding available to the Educational Technology and Information Services Department)

·        Effectiveness of criteria established for program monitoring and evaluation

 

The committee met on a number of occasions, including visiting District sites, from October 2001 through May 2002. During the combination and restructuring phase of the two technology departments the district undertook the development and adoption of a new strategic plan, “Glendale Schools, 2005”.  The new strategic plan included the adoption of a new planning process and document format.  The new plan also incorporated new or updated core organizational values, a revised mission statement and new strategic directions. 

 

With the completion and adoption of the new district strategic plan the process began for a new master technology plan that would align with the new strategic plan.  Consistent with the “Glendale Schools, 2005” strategic plan, the new educational technology and information services department developed three strategic objectives to support technology use in the district. These three objectives included: (1) developing the foundation for an effective infrastructure, (2) providing the necessary maintenance and support to insure that the infrastructure remained viable at all times and (3) to ensure the development of practices both instructional and in business services that supported the mission of the district and improved student learning.  This development was launched based on the premise that it is impossible to have an effective technology based organization instructional program or business services without a consistent well developed standardized and fault tolerant infrastructure. This infrastructure had been developed since the 2000-2001 school year using Measure K school bond funds, the federal e-rate program, the California Digital High School (DHS) program and Assembly Bill 2882 funding.  These funds have helped complete the basic infrastructure needs at a majority of district schools while providing additional professional development. 

 

During the period of October 2001 through June 2002, the Committee held eight formal meetings and other numerous meetings of its four established sub-committees. The plan was reviewed in depth with staff, committee members and the Educational Technology and Information Services Department.  The Committee spent several months educating itself, involving members and staff in detailed and meaningful discussions and has developed and completed a detailed set of questions in regard to the technology plan through sub-committees assigned to the major chapters of the plan.  The Committee recognized that the current District technology plan met the requirements of the California Department of Education for technology planning and special funding.  However, the committee unanimously agreed that the technology plan needed to be updated and improved with regard to detail, scope and direction. All of these activities formed the strong base upon which the current technology planning process has been based.

 

The Board of Education, at its meeting on June 25, 2002, received the Summary Report of the Educational Technology Advisory Committee regarding the District Technology Plan.  On August 5, 2002, the Board of Education received a discussion report regarding further development of a Master Plan for District Technology and Information Services.   Following this action, the “District Technology and Planning” Board Policy, as well as the “District Technology and Planning” Administrative Regulation that describe the technology planning “guiding principles,” were approved by the Board of Education on September 10, 2002.  At that meeting the formation, membership and meeting dates of the previously proposed Technology Master Plan Committee were also approved.

 

Under the direction of the Superintendent and Board of Education, the Technology Master Plan Committee was formed and met on October 9 and 24, 2002 to assist the District in the development of strategic planning model that would provide a detailed road map toward the development of a new District Technology Master Plan.  The Technology Master Plan Committee met on two occasions in October 2002 to accomplish the objectives established by the Board of Education at its meeting of September 10, 2002. These objectives were:

 

·        Revisit and validate the technology mission statement of the District.

·        Establish a specific vision for where technology will be in Glendale Unified in the short, mid and long-term.

·        Create specific action plans in areas including funding and budget, monitoring and evaluation, curriculum and instruction, professional development and infrastructure with recommended time lines for implementation.

 

The two-day planning process was very successful and resulted in proposed recommendations for the Board of Education.  During the course of the first full-day meeting, the committee was informed of “leading practices” in technology, reviewed the state of technology in the District, reviewed the work of the Technology Advisory Committee, and reviewed the new Board Policy and Administrative Regulation regarding District Technology and Planning.  With this firm foundation, the committee was able to develop a vision statement and goals before the conclusion of the meeting.

 

Rationale

 

A plan of the scope of that envisioned in the technology portion of Glendale’s 2005 Strategic Plan requires significant allocation of time and resources.  This investment must be based on a sound vision that technology can deliver on its promise and that it has a unique capacity to accomplish tasks otherwise not possible.  The Glendale Technology Plan is based on the following District Technology Guiding Principles that were approved by the Board of Education on September 10, 2002:

 

  1. The primary purpose of technology, including computers, is to support high quality learning experiences for all students.
  2. Technology will be used to provide an effective management information system for the District’s instructional, business, human resources, and student services programs and services.
  3. Standards should be established which address the appropriate level of computers that should be in place at each school site.  Plans should also identify the resources necessary for schools to meet these standards and how these resources might be provided.
  4. The effective use of technology by all staff members will be supported through on-going professional development activities.
  5. The costs of technology shall be based both on initial investment and long-term operational costs, including equipment upgrading and replacement.
  6. Decisions on network design and implementation and purchases of computers and other technology must provide for appropriate periods of transition and a sufficient level of fiscal resources to implement necessary changes at the school and district level.
  7. The District will develop and maintain an organizational structure that enables it to implement these principles, strategic planning goals, and district/site level technology plans.
  8. The District will develop and maintain a strategic planning process for technology which will be used to establish goals, identify action plans, and coordinate progress towards goals.  The major focus should be on computers and the District’s network.   Results will be reported annually to the Board.
  9. The District will insure that adequate security measures are in place to safeguard network operations and limit access of students and staff as needed to specific data.

 

 

Plan Duration and Modification

 

This three-year plan (September, 2003 through June, 2006) coincides, in large part, with the duration of the Glendale 2005 strategic plan, addresses district challenges and priorities and builds on the detailed planning and review of educational technology initiatives.  Due to the dynamic nature of technology built into the plan it is the understanding that modifications and alterations may occur over the plans life.  All affected district departments, the Board and the California Department of Education, must approve such modifications.  The plan will be reviewed at least on an annual basis and any and all modifications will be reported to the administrator of educational technology and information services. The timelines for curriculum and professional development aspects of this Plan, for the three-year duration, are located on pages 51 – 82.

Back to Top
 


2.  STAKEHOLDERS

 

The development of the Glendale Unified School District (GUSD) initial Educational Technology Plan was conducted with the full support of the Superintendent and Governing Board and involved a multi-step process that built on the district’s strong foundation of community involvement.  As stated in the GUSD 2005 Strategic Plan “The District is a respected partner and encourages strong linkages throughout the community.  All connections strengthen the instructional program and increase opportunities for student success in and beyond the classroom.  The District models strong collaboration among teachers to promote student learning.  Parents are necessary partners and are essential in providing a high level of support for their student’s learning, school and District."

 

“Linkages provide community access to schools as centers of learning and promote cooperation among governmental agencies.  Linkages also ensure that every school has viable business, organizational, and other community partners.  Colleges and universities reach out to District students before high school graduation to help them develop goals toward post-secondary education.  Higher education and the District cooperate to provide high quality teacher and administrator training.”  The planning process involved a broad base of community and staff members with more than 150 individuals involved ranging from parents and interested citizens, to engineers from Jet Propulsion Laboratories, animators from Walt Disney and Warner Brother Studios, members of the City Council, members of the local instruction industry, local computer industry professionals and Glendale Unified staff members. Recognizing the critical importance of involving all stakeholders in the District in the formation, development and ongoing evaluation and modification of the Plan, the committee consisted of the following individuals, listed below, by title.  The scope of this involvement included participation in needs assessment surveys, participation on the District Technology Planning Committee and in numerous data gathering sessions as:

 

Students                      Planning: High school students were involved at all times, serving on the District Technology Planning Committee and various other formal and informal sub-committees.  Middle and elementary school students involved as appropriate on formal and informal technology sub-committees. These students were appointed by District principals and represented all District High Schools.

 

Implementation: During the implementation stage, students will serve on formal and informal committees to create a continuous feedback loop to the District regarding the success of the Technology Plan.  They will be instrumental in recommending changes, as appropriate, in the efforts of GUSD to support technology.  They will meet at least quarterly throughout the duration of the Plan to accomplish this role.

 

Parents                       Planning: The Glendale Parent/Teacher Association appointed representatives to serve on various technology committees related to this Plan.  The individual(s) often were District PTA leaders.

 

                        Implementation: As the plan is implemented, the 26 District PTA groups will be involved at least twice a year to provide feedback to GUSD leadership regarding the success of the Plan.  PTA groups will actively seek feedback from constituents of their respective parent groups to involve as many parents as possible in the evaluation and modification of the GUSD Plan as it develops.

 

Teachers                     Planning: The Glendale Teachers Association (CTA, NEA) appointed individuals to serve on this committee. Teachers usually represented a majority of the membership of technology planning committees of all types.

 

Implementation: Teachers will play a major role in evaluating the success of the GUSD Technology Plan. A variety of instruments will be developed to provide teachers easy and immediate feedback tools to provide suggested modifications and feedback data to the District leadership. A formal annual survey will be administered at the end of each year, 1, 2 and 3 to evaluate the success of the Plan and modifications will be made, as appropriate. 

 

Classified                    Planning: Classified employees were represented on all District Employees                 technology  committees  with all  individuals  serving appointed by CSEA.

CSEA played a significant role in defining workable plans to support technology use by students and to streamline technology use by District support personnel.

                                   

Implementation: Classified employees will play a significant role in the successful implementation of technology systems to support productivity and to enhance teaching and learning in the District. Representatives of this group will continue to serve on formal and informal committees to accomplish their role in a successful manner. These committees will meet frequently to continuously evaluate Plan progress and to suggest modifications.

 

Principals                    Planning: At least 3 principals served on all technology committees charged with designing the Plan, representing elementary, middle and high school leadership in the District. The Superintendent appointed these individuals.

 

                        Implementation: As the Plan is implemented; principals will play a key role on a daily basis, providing GUSD leadership with relevant and pertinent data related to the success of Plan components.  Feedback will be informal on a daily basis and formal feedback will be provided to GUSD, by principals, on at least a bi-monthly basis.

 

 

District                        Planning:  The   Assistant   Superintendent,   Director,   Curriculum    and

Leadership                 Instruction, Director, Professional Development, and the Directors and/or Coordinators of Special Education and Student Services have been and will continue to be involved in the Plan throughout its duration in order to assure  system-wide  implementation of the Plan for all students in GUSD.

                        The Administrator, Educational Technology and Information Services demonstrated strong leadership throughout the formation, development and ongoing evaluation/modification of the Plan. 

 

                        Implementation: As key decision-makers in the District, this group will be the recipient of critical data regarding the success of the Plan on an informal basis daily, and on a formal basis from all constituent groups, on a periodic basis.

 

Educational                 Planning: This Committee has provided numerous members to Technology                 technology planning efforts. This Committee is comprised of leading Advisory                    technology experts in the Los Angeles area, including representatives Committee                from  Jet  Propulsion  Laboratories,  Nestle  Corporation,   local   planning       

firms, local small technology businesses and the Los Angeles Unified School District. 

 

                        Implementation: The expertise of the members of this committee will be critical to the success of the Technology Plan.  The Committee will meet quarterly throughout the duration of the Plan to assure that suggested modifications and improvements and other evaluation data is analyzed. In concert with District leadership, this Committee will provide strong support to the success of the Plan.

 

Technology/                Planning: Technology and business professionals serve as key     Business                  stakeholders in the District technology planning process, bringing Professionals                    current technology  expertise  to the  District  as  well  as  representing  the

interests and support of the business community to the technology planning effort.

.

Implementation: The expertise and experience of the members of this committee will be also critical to the success of the Technology Plan.  The Committee will meet quarterly throughout the duration of the Plan to assure that suggested modifications and improvements and other evaluation data is analyzed. In concert with District leadership, this Committee will provide strong support to the success of the Plan.

 

Community                 Planning: Community agencies that serve the GUSD community were Non-Profit                    involved in the development of various aspects of the planning process, and Service                 participating on sub-committees, advisory groups and in informal input Agencies                  sessions. This group has been quite involved in adult literacy collaboration

efforts.

 

                        Implementation: This group will be called upon frequently as collaborators in the implementation of the GUSD Technology Plan. As the District is involved in numerous projects with community non-profit and service agencies, feedback loops, both formal and informal, will be developed and will play a role in modifications made to the Plan.

                       

 

Back to the Top


 

 3.  CURRICULUM

 

a.         Current Technology Access

 

The extensive infrastructure built to provide resources in the District allows for teaching and learning resources to be available to ALL students and teachers in the school district.  There are slight differences in accessibility between high schools, middle schools and elementary schools, which reflect the contrast in state funding for the three types of schools.  The chart below indicates the level of accessibility currently available for teaching and learning.

 

Type of Access

Conditions

Internet Connectivity

 

 

 

§         All schools in the Glendale Unified School District are connected to the Internet.  This was accomplished using a combination of local general funds, modernization bond (Measure K), federal E-rate, and Digital High School funding.  The District connects to SBC via 2 DS-3 connections and connects to Pacific Bell Internet via a DS-3 ATM connection, both running at 40 MBs.  The network is a switched 100 network with multiple server systems.  The district has (28) T1 lines available for each OC-3 line and is currently operating at 66% use.  All are point-to-point connections.

§         The (3) comprehensive high schools and (1) magnet high school are connected via (2) T1 lines per school.  (4) middle and (20) elementary schools are connected via (1) T1 line per school.  Several of the schools have wireless networks in place.  All classrooms in the district have internet connectivity, with 5 internet ports per classroom, each running at 10 MBs.

Student/Computer Ratio

 

§         The Clark Magnet High School has a student to computer ratio of 2:1.

§         The (3) comprehensive high schools have a student to computer ratio of 4:1.  Middle and elementary schools have student to computer ratios of 8:1 or lower.

Additional Computer Access

 

§         (1) networked library at every school

§         (1) networked computer lab at every school

§         All high schools have 5-6 computer labs each, featuring business education and computer assisted digital design labs at all high schools with reading labs, ELD labs, animation labs, art, photography and mass communications labs and a business academy at various schools.

§         All middle schools have a Paxton-Patterson, 16 station computer/science lab featuring weather, light and laser tech machines.

§         All middle schools have an Improvement computer lab.

§         (1) middle school has a computerized business program.

§         Several public libraries and community technology centers within the district with Internet access, available to students.

Other Access to Technology Tools

 

 

§         A wide variety of probe ware in high school science classrooms.

§         Graphing and other types of calculators in high school math classes.

§         Television monitors connected to cable in the majority of classrooms.

§         District Media Center with a catalog of thousands of video titles.

§         LCD or DPL projectors available to all classrooms.

§         Laserdisc players, MIDI keyboards, bar code readers, scanners, camcorders, microphones and removable media storage devices.

 

Home Accessibility

 

While data has not yet been analyzed for the 2000-2001 year, the 1999-2000 survey results provided the following information:

 

·        66% of students had computers in their home.

·        55% of students reported having Internet access in their home.

·        93% of teachers had a computer and printer.

·        17% of teachers reported Internet access through a cable modem or DSL.

·        69% of teachers reported using a standard modem connection.

 

Accessibility Challenges

 

With a majority of classrooms and multiple labs now wired for Internet connectivity due to the infrastructure funded by multiple funding sources made available to schools, i.e. local general funds, modernization bond (Measure K), federal E-rate and Digital High School funding, the challenge to reduce the student/computer ratio remains.  A high priority is to assure that access is provided for all student populations, including special education students, English language learners, GATE students and other students with special needs. Currently special education students who need assistive technology for access and independence are referred on an individual basis and assessed by the Special Education department. Devices provided for these students include alternative keyboards, alternative mouse interfaces, portable word processors, and software that enables them to perform reading and writing tasks using an alternative method (such as auditory feedback, speech input, screen readers, scanning and onscreen keyboards, etc.).

Special software and hardware configurations target the needs of English Language Learners (ELL). These include software such as Read 180, GUSD authored software targeting language proficiency needs of ELL students and individual software programs to increase reading comprehension and fluency of these students.  Exemplary opportunities have been provided in the District for GATE students in numerous areas such as digital media production tools, digital animation tools, the creation of web pages, high level use of databases, spreadsheets and email and optimum use of technology for record keeping.

 

A secondary significant goal is to make computers available for students and teachers as often as possible during the day and week. During class time, maximum time is made available to students and teachers, as course content permits. This is accomplished due to the numerous computer labs and media centers at district secondary schools and due to the broad access in elementary school classrooms. At the high schools and middle schools in GUSD, computers are available before and after school and during the lunch period. Due to the high priority to supervise all students, elementary school student access before and after school and during the lunch period is more limited than that of secondary school students. Access to teachers is unlimited before, during and after school, as schedules permit. The majority of computers installed at all levels have been installed in general or specialized computer labs to maximize student access.  The 2 to 8:1 student to computer ratio are largely due to this type of access. In classrooms, there are approximately 1-2 computers in the average K-6 and 7-8 classrooms with 2-3 in the average 9-12 classroom. As professional development goals are met, the number of computers requested in classrooms will increase and labs will become more specialized. In Library and Media Centers, the average density of computers involves 7 computers in elementary Library and Media Centers, 10 computers in middle school Library and Media Centers and 30 in high school Library and Media Centers.

 

With the majority of the schools at 8:1 or better, the goal of a 1:1 student to computer ratio, suggested by the state, may be a realistic one in the future.  Currently 60% of the computers installed in the District are 3 years old or newer. The critical aspect of this goal is to offer access in setting that optimizes teaching and learning such as specialized labs, wireless classroom labs, using hand-held devices, where appropriate and extending access to the homes of students.

 

b.         Technology Use

 

Forty-two percent of the certificated staff had completed the CTAP2 survey when the plan-writing process began. The average proficiency for most sections was Intermediate. Teachers reported higher skill levels for the word processing component. The lowest reported skill levels were in the areas of database and spreadsheet use. 

 

Technology use in the classrooms varies from classroom to classroom and school to school, ranging from minimal use to model classroom status.  A significant number of teachers in the district have received some training in the use of computers to improve teaching and enhance learning, as measured by surveys administered by the Educational Technology and Information Services Department. The top ten percent of teachers in the district model the use of technology to gather and disseminate information, using the most modern of tools to achieve that objective including digital media production tools, digital animation tools, the creation of web pages, high level use of databases, spreadsheets and email and optimum use of technology for record keeping and communication with parents.  Based on a survey approximately sixty percent of the teachers use the Internet for research, use video resources and Power Point for lesson presentation, frequently use email and require the use of word processors for student work and for preparation of learning materials.  Based on survey data approximately twenty percent of teachers are eager but beginning users of computer and video technologies for teaching and student learning and another ten percent are reluctant users of technology in their classrooms.  The chart below illustrates in a subject-matter matrix, the specific uses of computer for instruction in GUSD.

 

Subject

Uses of Technology

Library

1.      Licensed databases expand print sources for reference via Internet providing virtual reference libraries in all schools

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used daily by students, on an in-class basis consistent with their scheduled library time, and at all times during open library time. 

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used daily by teachers as their schedules permit.

All Subjects

 

 

2.      Use of Office 2000 for productivity

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used daily by students in most subject areas for reports, compositions etc.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used daily by most teachers for communication and lesson preparation.

3.      Use of web page creation tools for teaching and learning

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used daily by students in most subject areas for reports, compositions etc.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used daily by most teachers for communication and lesson preparation.

4.      Media Center videos and other recordings

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used occasionally by students by students in most subject areas as support for presentations, and as a resource for digital media production.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used daily by most teachers as an instructional aide to support other lesson content.

Mathematics

 

 

5.      Larsen Mathematics

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used daily in District middle schools as a strong supplement to Mathematics instruction.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used in middle school Mathematics classes to reinforce some material and to teach other material.

6.      Accelerated Mathematics

Typical Frequency of Use by students Used daily in District elementary classrooms as a strong supplement to Mathematics instruction.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used daily in District elementary classrooms to reinforce Mathematics concepts and to allow for student practice of new learning.

7.      Other courseware

Typical Frequency of Use by students: A variety of software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: A variety of software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Language Arts/English Language Learners

 

 

8.      Read 180

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used frequently in all elementary classrooms as students are in need of further English language and reading development.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used frequently in all elementary classrooms to support students who are English Language learners or struggling readers for non-linguistic reasons.

9.      Accelerated Reader

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used frequently in all elementary classrooms as many students are in need of further English language and reading development.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used frequently to support students in elementary classrooms for English Language learners or struggling readers for non-linguistic reasons.

10.  Krashen model customized HyperCard program

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Generally used in high school classrooms for students who are in need of further English language and reading development.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used typically by teachers who have been specially trained in this program’s operation and capability.

11.  Use of word processors to create properly-formatted reports

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used primarily in secondary (7-12) classrooms, as appropriate. Highest use has been in English/Language Arts classrooms.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used daily for communication and preparation of lesson materials.

12.  Use of electronic presentation tools

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used quite frequently in all subject areas for oral presentations, projects and reports.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used daily for communication and preparation of lesson materials.

13.  Internet research in literature

Typical Frequency of Use by students: High frequency use in all classrooms grades 4-12.   Highest level of use is at the high school level in history and social science classrooms. Scaled use down to little or no use at the elementary primary class level.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers Used daily for research, preparation of lesson materials.

14.  Other courseware

Typical Frequency of Use by students: A variety of software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: A variety of software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Social Studies

15.  Internet research in History and Social Science

This is one of the areas of highest use of technology in GUSD classrooms. National Geographic is the most used in classrooms by students.

16.  History and Cultural courseware

Typical Frequency of Use by students: A variety of software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: A variety of history and cultural software titles are used daily, as needed to reinforce concepts.

Science

17.  Paxton-Patterson Science labs

Typical Frequency of Use by students: High frequency use by students several times per week with high levels of motivation to learn by experimentation with new Science concepts.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Teachers use this resource as often as the schedule permits to increase student motivation and to provide hands-on learning.

18.  Internet research in Science

Typical Frequency of Use by students: High levels of use in grades 4-12, by all students, to reinforce and expand science learning.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand science learning.

19.  Computer-based probe ware in lab classes

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used in specialized learning settings for advanced experimentation in science.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand science learning.

20.  Simulations and virtual labs

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used primarily in high school advanced science classes.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used primarily by high school teachers to expand and enrich teaching of science concepts through simulations.

21.  Textbook-based support courseware

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used as often as is available by textbook publishers. Access to computers is very high when this type of courseware is available and is effective to enhance student learning.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used as often as is available by textbook publishers for all students, as learning profiles deem appropriate.

Business Education

22.  Business Education labs

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used primarily in dedicated business classes at the high school level, for virtually all learning tasks.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used primarily in dedicated business classes at the high school level to provide students with teaching and learning experiences otherwise unavailable.

23.  Business Academy

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Enrolled in by Business Education students to complete the business education Academy specialized requirements.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers N/A

 

Computer Assisted Design

24.  Computer Assisted design labs at each high school

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used in specialized learning settings for design productivity by all students enrolled in CAD classes. Lab is available during non-class time for students.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand the teaching of CAD concepts. Lab is available during non-class time for teachers.

Animation

25.  Teacher-created Animation labs at high schools7

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used in specialized learning settings for high-level animation using appropriate state-of-the-art software. Used daily by students taking advanced animation classes. Lab is available during non-class time for students.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand the teaching of animation concepts using modern technology. Lab is available during non-class time for teachers.

26.  Textbook-based support courseware

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used where appropriate at all grade levels K-12 to reinforce concepts presented in textbooks or to enable practice of learning in textbooks. This type of courseware is available in all classrooms using textbooks to present units of learning.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand the teaching of core instructional concepts, based on California State standards.

 

Photography

27.  Computer-based Photography labs at high schools

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Used in specialized learning settings for design productivity by all students enrolled in Photography classes. Lab is available during non-class time for students.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used only as appropriate to reinforce and expand the teaching of Photography concepts. Lab is available during non-class time for teachers

Special Education

28.  Assistive technology devices are provided to students based on an individual referral and assessment process including FM systems, alternative keyboards and mouse interfaces, screen readers, word processors, or augmentative and alternative communication devices.

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Assistive technology devices used on a daily basis by students with special needs in all content areas.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used frequently to assure equal access to educational content. 

29.  Assistive technology software is issued for individual students who require it. The software might be installed in the special education classroom or in a general education classroom or on the student’s home computer as needed.

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Assistive technology devices used on a daily basis by students with special needs in all content areas.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used frequently to assure equal access to educational content. 

30.  Assistive technology software includes word processing software with auditory feedback, voice recognition software, screen reading software, typing tutor software, word prediction software and grammar and spell checking software.

Typical Frequency of Use by students: Assistive technology devices used on a daily basis by students with special needs in all content areas.

Typical Frequency of Use by teachers: Used frequently to assure equal access to educational content. 

 

c.         Curricular Goals and Content Standards

 

The number-one priority at all Glendale schools is to maximize student achievement with particular attention to literacy, the area of lowest achievement for the majority of California students.  Consistent with the GUSD 2005 Strategic Plan the intent of the Technology Plan is to assure that “Academic standards align with rigorous state, national and international standards to guide instruction and assessment and serve to ensure increased student learning for all students.” 

 

The plan also assures equal access consistent with the GUSD 2005 Strategic Plan that “All students have equal access to instructional programs that effectively promote students reaching District standards.  Challenging courses are designed to increase learning among all students, and do not limit access to high quality course content and instruction.  Students receive the services, supported by sufficient resources, to meet these world-class standards.”  Targets and strategies in this plan are consistent with the Strategic Plan, stated as follows: “Each school will provide students with access to a rigorous curriculum and sufficient opportunities to learn by meeting or exceeding District determined participation and pass rates.  The District will develop the technological infrastructure to support the collection and analysis of student achievement data on an ongoing basis.”

 

The context in which the maximization of student achievement will take place is based on the following five overarching goals:

 

·        Develop rigorous academic standards that prepare students for college and/or employment.

·        Integrate parents and community members as education partners.

·        Target skills that prepare students for the high-tech, multicultural 21st century.

·        Create a safe and supportive learning environment.

·        Establish overall district responsibility based on student performance

 

All reform efforts in the district, including educational technology, are aligned with these goals.

 

The goals below reflect the district’s philosophy regarding technological support for curricular goals. The implementation plan for these goals is woven into the Professional Development and Infrastructure sections of this document.

 

d.         Goals for using technology to improve teaching and learning by supporting the district curriculum

I.  Curriculum & Instruction

 

1) GOAL:                                Identify and support ALL students’ individual needs.

 

                                    a) Objective:                Provide assessment data to each teacher’s

                                                                        workstation to guide instruction

 

                                                                                                BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1

 

Determine the multiple measurement data to be provided to all teachers and establish the method of electronic delivery.  Provide the established data to 50% of District teachers.

End of Year 2

 

Provide multiple measurement data to 75% of District teachers.

End of Year 3

 

Provide multiple measurement data for students at each teacher’s workstation.

 

                              b) Objective:                Provide appropriate computer based resources to

                                                                  design   and deliver instruction based on student

                                                                  assessment data

                                                                                         

                                                                                          BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Determine (current) appropriate computer-based resources (hardware, accessories, software) to assist instruction based upon student assessment.  Provide these resources to teachers to assist 20% of students.

End of Year 2:

 

Review and update computer-based resources (database).  Provide these resources to teachers to assist 50% of students.

End of Year 3:

 

Review and update computer-based resources (database).  Provide these resources to teachers to assist 70% of students.

 

                              c) Objective:                 Provide all students access to current (“multimedia

                                                                  and network capable”) technology for instruction

                                                                  striving for a ratio of five students to one computer

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:  

 

Additional computer workstations to all schools to reduce the student to computer ratio to 10:1 (including libraries and computers labs).

End of Year 2

 

Additional computer workstations to all schools to reduce the student to computer ratio to 8:1 (including libraries and computers labs).

End of Year 3

 

Additional computer workstations to all schools to reduce the student to computer ratio to 5:1 (including libraries and computers labs).

 

                                    d) Objective:                Require students to demonstrate a sequence of

                                                                        technology skills to achieve district graduation

                                                                        (technology) requirements

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1

 

100% of graduating grade 12 students will meet the current Level 1 Technology Graduation Requirement.  The District will determine new or adjusted requirements for future years.

End of Year 2

 

Implement new or adjusted technology graduation requirement.  100% of graduating grade 12 students will meet the requirement.

End of Year 3

 

Review and adjust (if necessary) the technology graduation requirement.  100% of graduating grade 12 students will meet the requirement.

 

e) Objective:                Provide technology based intervention strategies to ensure that each student meets grade level standards

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1

 

Develop and publish technology-based intervention strategies to help students meet grade level standards.  At least 30% of Intervention Program classes will provide appropriate technology based intervention strategies.

End of Year 2

 

Review and update as necessary, technology-based intervention strategies to help students meet grade level standards.   At least 60% of Intervention Program classes will provide appropriate technology based intervention strategies.

End of Year 3

 

Review and update as necessary, technology-based intervention strategies to help students meet grade level standards.   100% of Intervention Program classes will provide appropriate technology based intervention strategies.

 

2) GOAL:                                Enrich the curriculum so that it is engaging, rigorous and aligned to standards

 

a) Objective:                Provide course outlines with written strategies to integrate technology

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1

 

Identify courses and teachers.  Develop strategies to integrate technology.

End of Year 2

 

Develop at least five examples of integrating technology to support content learning for each new or re-written course.

End of Year 3

 

Add an additional five examples of integrating technology to support content learning for each new or re-written course.

 

b) Objective:                Provide methods and practices to deliver lessons to meet district technology-based performance standards for students

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1: 

 

Develop and field test methods and practices to deliver lessons to meet district technology-based performance standards for students. At least 50% of students in grades 7-12 will meet performance standards.

End of Year 2: 

 

Review and upgrade methods and practices to deliver lessons to meet district technology-based performance standards for students.   At least 75% of students in grades 7-12 will meet performance standards.

End of Year 3: 

 

100% of students in grades 7-12 will meet performance standards.

 

3) GOAL:                                Online courses will be provided to students to increase their access to curriculum content.       

 

a) Objective:                Provide students with access to a variety of online elective and core courses that might not otherwise be available to them.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

No implementation while online course technology and logistics are acquired.

End of Year 2:

 

An initial set of online classes will be offered.

End of Year 3:

 

Double the number of online classes offered.

 

4) GOAL:                                All special populations will have access to the technology that helps them meet their learning needs.

 

a) Objective:                Continue existing programs for low-incidence disabilities

 

BENCHMARKS

All years:

 

Continue to support low-incidence disabilities on a case-by-case basis.

 

b) Objective:                Provide universal access and adaptive technology to support learning-disabled students.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Research and identify software and web-based resources.

End of Year 2:

 

Pilot resources with a small number of students.

End of Year 3:

 

Provide resources to all learning disabled students.

 

c) Objective:                 Provide appropriate technology to English Language Learners (ELL)

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Research and identify software and web-based resources.

End of Year 2:

 

Pilot resources with a small number of students.

End of Year 3:

 

Provide resources to all ELL students.

 

e.         Technology and Information Literacy Skills

 

The acquisition of technological and information literacy skills has been somewhat inconsistent within and across school sites. Some middle school students learn word processing and keyboarding skills, and some high school students decide to take a Computer Applications elective class as available. Some students acquire technological and information literacy skills outside the district, either at home or in elementary school. All the high schools in the district are Digital High Schools (DHS), and each school has chosen, with varied success, different means to teach technology and information literacy skills. The District has provided 4 alternatives to demonstrate their mastery of technology and information literacy skills. These are:

 

1.      Successful completion of the Information Literacy class at the high school level. This is the option most frequently chosen by students.

2.      Successful completion of a proficiency test demonstrating mastery of technological and information literacy skills.

3.      Successful submission of a portfolio demonstrating experience and proficiency in technological and information literacy skills.

4.      Submit evidence of successful completion of class that is equivalent to the Information Literacy class.

 

The District has adopted a computer proficiency requirement for all graduating classes, starting with the class of 2005. This requirement is based on the National Education Technology Standards published by ISTE. After analysis of the data collected for the DHS grants, the district have decided to ensure that all students acquired technological and information literacy skills through one class. The skills are then reinforced in other classes as students complete Internet-based units, research projects, and other assignments. The proficiencies expected of each student include the following:

 

1.      Locating information using subscription services, print resources, reference materials, and the Internet.

2.      Distinguishing between fact, fiction and opinion when conducting research.

3.      Evaluating the appropriateness of sources and validating and synthesizing information acquired from these sources.

4.      Analyzing and organizing data and information and using it to make oral, written and/or visual presentations.

5.      Using computer resources safely, responsibly, ethically.

6.      Understanding and using the software that makes computers useful, including word processors, spreadsheets, e-mail, web browsers and presentation tools.

 

Goals and Objectives

 

1) GOAL:                                Students will acquire technological and information literacy skills.

 

a) Objective:                Train students to be proficient with the technological literacy skills in the GUSD Scope and Sequence of Technological Skills (SS-TS—consisting of basic operations and concepts, word processing, Internet search and retrieval, e-mail, spreadsheet, ethical use and presentation skills).

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

50% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in the SS-TS.

End of Year 2:

 

75% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in the SS-TS.

End of Year 3:

 

100% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in the SS-TS.

 

 

 

b) Objective:                Train students to be proficient with information literacy skills the ability to access, evaluate, and use information from a variety of sources) as outlined by the GUSD Scope and Sequence of Technological Skills.  (SS-TS)

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

50% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in information literacy skills.

End of Year 2:

 

75% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in information literacy skills.

End of Year 3:

 

100% of students in grades 7-12 will be trained in information literacy skills.

 

f.          Technology Access

 

The overarching goal of this Technology Plan is provide equity of access to technology to all students. Equitable access to technology has always been central to district policy. However, there are certain populations for whom specialized technologies are particularly important. Students who have special needs and require adaptive or assistive technologies as well as students who speak a first language other than English will be guaranteed equal access to all technologies included in the Plan. In addition to these student populations, other “minority populations” exist. These include and are not limited to students on accelerated academic schedules who may be unable to schedule the required advanced classes they need, students in certain advanced placement classes, students desiring requirements for the International Baccalaureate certification and GATE students need special consideration to assure access.  Should schools not have the resources to provide a specific class for a limited number of students, online classes will be made available to meet this challenge.

 

Funding for adaptive technology is available from the State of California for special education students with low-incidence disabilities. The district’s current Adaptive Technology program meets the needs of these students on an individual basis. Students who are not special education students and who need devices are provided for under the American Disabilities Act, Section 504. Learning Disabled students do not benefit from resources available to students with low-incidence disabilities.

 

Nearly 10,000 English Language Learners in the district could benefit from technology support tools especially in literacy.  The technology system will benefit these students by guiding the analysis of students’ levels of language acquisition (primary language and English) from multiple sources of data, including state assessments and classroom level assessment.  The technology systems will also assist in designing the English language development program, student placement, classroom instruction and informative and summative assessment of program effectiveness.  It will ensure English learners’ access to the core curriculum through differentiated instruction, Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE), and Structured English Immersion and ensure their full inclusion in the academic content of the mainstream curriculum.  These technologies provide audio feedback, word prediction and text reading capabilities.  Approximately 3,000 Learning Disabled students may also be able to take advantage of literacy support tools.

 

g.         Student Record Keeping

 

The District is the initial implementation phase of a new student information system (School Max) that significantly improves the accuracy and accessibility of all student records and related school and teacher data. At the beginning of the 2000-2001 school year, the District, recognizing the need for timely and accurate data to create data-driven classrooms, charged a team of selected staff members to work diligently on the replacement of the then current student information system (SIS) - SASi.  During the summer of 2000, two groups of staff members, the focus and secondary sub-committees of the Student Information System Replacement Committee, were selected to review and evaluate SIS products.  The focus committee, consisting of 12 members, had the primary responsibility of reviewing SIS systems and making a recommendation for adoption to the Superintendent and the Board of Education. The focus committee met on six occasions to review the job to be completed, to learn about the scope and availability of products on the market, to receive demonstrations of commonly used products and to develop a detailed “request for proposal” (RFP) that was made available to SIS vendors who wished to submit proposals regarding their systems to the District.

 

After a formal process, the District selected School Max. This student information system will form the core of the data management system used to improve teaching and learning in GUSD.

 

1) GOAL:                                All stakeholders will have the data they need to guide and support student needs.

 

a) Objective:                Deploy a Student Information System that will securely provide all stakeholders with access to job-specific student information including attendance, discipline, grades, health and contact information.

 

 

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Capacity to serve school data needs will be developed

End of Year 2:

 

Pilot testing of the School Max system

End of Year 3:

 

All schools will use the School Max system.

 

h.         Goals and Implementation Plan To Make Teachers and Administrators More Accessible To Parents

 

Technology is currently being used to improve home/school communication in the Glendale District in a variety of ways:

 

·        Products such as Gaggle, School Notes, and Black Board are being used at many school sites. These products are all web-based applications that allow access by students, teachers and parents around the clock. Many teachers depend on these services to provide information about classes to students and parents.

·        Each school in the district has its own web site with links to administrators and teachers. Parents can find information about important dates, events and policies there.

·        Every school in the district uses an Automatic Notification Program to send automatic phone messages to students’ homes. Typically parents are notified of a student’s absences, but the program can also be used to notify parents of any pertinent information about the school.

 

In a student survey conducted April 2001, 75 percent of students reported having Internet access in their homes. This suggests that the Internet could be an effective means of communicating with parents. There are still some unknowns, however. The district has no data on parent usage of the Internet or computers in general. The Glendale Unified School District will, during the course of this Plan develop the capacity to serve as an Internet Service Provider to assure that there is guaranteed access for children and families.

 

Goals and Objectives

 

1) GOAL:                                The school district will use technology to increase and improve home/school communication.

 

a) Objective:                Deploy telecommunications capability to all classrooms.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Deploy telecommunications capability to all middle school classrooms.

End of Year 2:

 

Deploy telecommunications capability to all middle school and high school classrooms.

End of Year 3:

 

Deploy telecommunications capability to all school classrooms.

 

                                    b) Objective:                Allow parents to securely view their students’ grade

information on the Web.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Beta test schools will have records available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 2:

 

Pilot test schools will have records available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 3:

 

All schools will have records available to parents via the Web.

 

c) Objective:                 Post the e-mail addresses of all teachers and administrators on district website.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

All e-mail addresses will be on district website.

End of Year 2:

 

E-mail addresses will be kept current.

End of Year 3:

 

E-mail addresses will be kept current.

 

d) Objective:                 Provide parents with updates on the state of technology in the district.

 

BENCHMARKS

All years:

 

Parents will receive a technology update during the Education Summit each year.

 

e) Objective:                 Investigate emerging technologies that provide parents and students at home with a connection to a district-provided educational electronic workspace.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Investigate emerging technologies

End of Year 2:

 

Information Technology and Educational Technology departments collaborate to create a report for the board. Set benchmarks for year 3.

End of Year 3:

 

Benchmarks will depend on investigation.

 

2) GOAL                                 School sites will use technology to increase and improve home/school communication.

 

a) Objective:                Use the School Web Site Rubric to provide clear content and timely and accurate information to parents via school web sites.

 

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

50% of all schools will review the school site web page and will keep it up to date in accordance with the School Web Site Rubric.

End of Year 2:

 

75% of all schools will review the school site web page and will keep it up to date in accordance with the School Web Site Rubric.

End of Year 3:

 

100% of all schools will review the school site web page and will keep it up to date in accordance with the School Web Site Rubric.

                                               

b) Objective:                Use e-mail to communicate with parents

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

50% of all staff will be using e-mail to communicate with parents

End of Year 2:

 

75% of all staff will be using e-mail to communicate with parents

End of Year 3:

 

100% of all staff will be using e-mail to communicate with parents

 

c) Objective:                 Allow parents to securely view their students’ grade and assignment information on the Web.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Beta test schools will make grade and assignment information available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 2:

 

Pilot test schools will make grade and assignment information available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 3:

 

All schools will make grade and assignment information available to parents via the Web.

 

d) Objective:                Provide teacher contact information for parents on the school web site.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

50% of schools will make teacher and administrator e-mail addresses available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 2:

 

All schools will make teacher and administrator e-mail addresses available to parents via the Web.

End of Year 3:

 

All schools will make teacher and administrator e-mail addresses available to parents via the Web.

 

 

 

i.          List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities.

 

Objectives, benchmarks and timeline can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

 

j.          Process To Monitor Benchmarks And Timeline

 

Evaluation schedule, person responsible, and plan modification process can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

 

Back to the Top


4.  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 

In the GUSD staff development occurs in the context of systemic change management.  Focus will be placed on attitudes, readiness and skill levels of all employees in the school district.  Staff development programs in technology will be comprehensive coordinated with other district goals and cover a variety of skills, applications, and technologies.  Based upon current research, training will address how teachers can effectively integrate technology into teaching and learning to improve student achievement.  A systems approach will be employed focusing on the capacity of teachers to use data in instructional decision making.  Focus will be placed on using diagnostic academic data in conjunction with available technology resources.  As stated in the GUSD 2005 Strategic Plan “Professional development is based on research and proven learning theories.  All employees have access to professional development that inspires excellence; promotes skills, knowledge and areas of expertise; and enhances services to students, ultimately resulting in increased student learning.”  Over an extended period of time all employees of the district will understand how educational technology strategies match with strong academic data management systems will create the highest level of student performance.  All employees of the district will model the use of technology in their own work and levels of proficiency will be integrated into employee evaluation.  Professional development opportunities will be tailored to specific needs of staff at all levels and parents will be trained to become effective partners in the teaching and learning process.

 

a.         Current Skills and Needs

 

As a result of the strong investment in educational technology made by the district since 1995 approximately 60% of the 1500 teachers in the district are frequent users or “experts” in the use of instructional technology to improve student learning, as measured by surveys conducted by the Educational Technology and Information Services Department.  Thirty percent of teachers in the district are late adopters of technology and only 10% are beginners in effective uses in educational technology.  The trends indicate that strongest users are at the high school level with the second strongest group of skill levels appearing in teachers of grades 4-8.  This to a large degree parallels the funding priorities of the state of California.  The 2001 CTAP surveys were returned at a 26% return rate.  The table below indicates staff responses to questions on the survey.

 

 

Software

No

Experience %

Know basics %

Moderate skill %

Advanced %

Email

0%

10%

60%

30%

Word processing

10%

25%

40%

25%

Web browsers

5%

35%

40%

20%

Classroom

Management

0%

60%

30%

10%

Presentation

30%

40%

20%

10%

Graphics

35%

45%

20%

10%

Spreadsheets

60%

20%

15%

5%

Courseware

35%

45%

20%

10%

Multimedia authoring

60%

20%

20%

10%

Academic Data Management

50%

35%

10%

5%

Databases

70%

20%

10%

0%

 

The chart above clearly indicates that teachers are prolific users of email, word processors, web browsers, presentation software and classroom management software.  The same chart indicates less use and skill in multi-media authoring, databases, graphics, spreadsheets and academic courseware.

 

b.         Professional Development Goals

 

To take advantage of the powerful infrastructure in place in GUSD and to accelerate high performance on the part of students and teachers professional development becomes a critically high priority.  The district has recently installed a comprehensive student information system, School Max, and training of staff to use this powerful tool to manage data will continue as a  priority in 2003.  The potential and capability of the system is very powerful and will meet numerous objectives established in the district including academic data management, home school communication effective grade reporting among other uses.  The district has moved forward in a strong way to implement systemic change for all employees and students in the district.  In this context professional development will involve encouraging of ongoing learning in technology for all employees, the modeling of technology by administrators, the modeling of technology in regular communications and publications within departments and schools and will involve increased opportunities and incentives for learning for all employees.  These incentives will include prioritization of technology training into staff development days and inclusion of technology proficiencies into certificated and classified evaluation systems. 

 

The district will launch an effort to train all employees in the use in application of a variety of technologies.  This will be launched with a technology staff development needs assessment and the development of a plan to respond with training opportunities to needs defined.  A trainer of trainers model will be at the heart of the broad implementation of the professional development program in order to reach as many teachers as possible in the shortest time period possible.  The professional development program will assure that teachers attain proficiencies in the use of technology as an informational resource for teaching, managing and learning.  Students will be afforded distance-learning opportunities and to that end teachers and classified staff will be trained in the appropriate use of such technologies.  The home school component of the GUSD technology plan will be enhanced by training of staff, students and family members by the use of sharing academic and other pertinent data between students, teachers, home and school.

 

Sharing Best Practices:

 

Throughout the course of GUSD planning in technology, teachers have strongly expressed the desire to share best teaching practices. The Professional Development will take advantage of available technologies such as digital media production tools, utilities for on-line learning, web casting and other utilities to create a bank of resources of best practices to enable such sharing among teachers in the GUSD.

 

Online Classes:

 

The emergence of a variety of software and hardware tools to facilitate on-line learning will be used wherever appropriate to provide teachers with anytime, anywhere learning opportunities. These courses will always be targeted to meet specific learning goals based on GUSD standards and will be evaluated on an ongoing basis.

 

Goals and Objectives

II.  Professional Development

 

1) GOAL:                                Encourage ongoing learning in technology for all employees

 

a) Objective:                Administrators will model utilization of technology

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Re-examine current technology standards for administrators and managers and publish any updated standards.  Determine areas of the standards in greatest need of staff development.  Begin staff development program.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Continue the staff development program and add additional topics.  At least 70% of administrators and managers will meet technology standards.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Continue the staff development program and add additional topics.  100% of administrators and managers will meet technology standards.

 

b) Objective:                Utilize technology in regular communications and publications within departments and schools

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Determine the availability of technology-based communications and publications.  Determine current use of technology-based communications and publications throughout the District.  Develop information source, and training program, to improve use of technology tools.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Inform staff of available tools, provide training, and reach level of 50% use of technology-based communication and publication tools.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Inform staff of available tools, provide training, and reach level of 75% use of technology-based communication and publication tools.

 

2) GOAL:                                Create opportunities and incentives for learning for all employees

 

a) Objective:                Build a technology training component into staff

development days, senate/banking days, and/or monthly staff

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Each school & department will include at least one technology-related training opportunity per year.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Each school & department will include at least one technology-related training opportunity per year.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Each school & department will include at least one technology-related training opportunity per year.

 

                                    b) Objective:                Credentialed employees will have technology

                                                                        integrated into at least one of their evaluation goals

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

At least 33% of credentialed employees will develop and meet a technology-integrated goal

End of Year 2:

 

 

An additional 33% of credentialed employees will develop and meet a technology-integrated goal.

End of Year 3:

 

 

An additional 34% of credentialed employees will develop and meet a technology-integrated goal.

 

                                    c) Objective:                 Classified employees will have a technology

                                                                        proficiency component in their evaluation as it

                                                                        relates to their position

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Define technology-based competencies for classified employee positions.  Develop staff training opportunities for classified staff on expected technology competencies.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Develop and provide staff training opportunities for classified staff on expected technology competencies.  Begin training program – reach 60% of classified staff.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Continue to provide staff training opportunities for classified staff on expected technology competencies.  Redesign classified evaluation form to include evaluation of new technology competencies.  Train an additional 40% of classified staff.  Evaluate classified employees on expected technology competencies.

3) GOAL:                                Train all employees in the use and application of appropriate technologies

 

a) Objective:                Determine technology staff development needs

within schools and departments to tailor professional development opportunities

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Develop and implement a technology staff development needs assessment.  Publish results.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Based on the needs assessment, develop and implement a staff development program to respond with training opportunities for the most critical needs.  Reach 30% of staff.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Based on the needs assessment, develop and implement additional staff development programs.  Reach 40% of staff.

                                               

                                    b) Objective:                Encourage a trainer of trainers model at each site

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Design a technology “trainer of trainers” model for technology instruction and support.  Test the model and implement.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Train staff in order to have one “trainer of trainers” at 60% of school sites.

End of Year 3:

 

 

100% of schools will have at least one staff member trained as a “trainer of trainers” in technology applications.

 

                                    c) Objective:                 Provide teachers and students access to technology

                                                                        as an informational resource for teaching,

                                                                        managing, and learning

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Gather baseline data

End of Year 2:

 

 

From baseline, an additional 10% of teaching staff and students will report using technology to support teaching, managing, and learning.

End of Year 3:

 

 

From second year, an additional 10% of teaching staff and students will report using technology to support teaching, managing, and learning.

 

                                    d) Objective:                Provide students access to various/existing distance learning opportunities

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Identify subject matter experts (SME) to deliver distance learning.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Develop and provide at least five videoconferences with SME attended by more than 250 students.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Develop and provide at least ten videoconferences with SME attended by more than 500 students.

 

4) GOALS:                              Provide students and family members information about student progress

 

a) Objective:                Provide secure access via the Internet to real time data regarding student attendance, performance, and progress

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Develop and Beta test an Internet, parent access system.  Continue to provide Elementary Report Card via the Internet.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Pilot test the Internet access system.  Pilot test schools will have data available to parents via the Internet.

End of Year 3:

 

 

100% of all schools will have data available to parents via the Internet.

 

           

c.         List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities.

 

Benchmarks, timeline and strategies can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

 

d.         Process To Monitor Benchmarks And Timeline

 

Evaluation data, person responsible, and plan modification process can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

 

Back to the top


 

5.  INFRASTRUCTURE

 

a.         Needs Assessment

 

The Board of Education reflects the strong commitment of the Glendale community to achieve the teaching, learning and professional development goals defined in this technology plan.  In order to fully accomplish all aspects of these goals and objectives it is critical to provide a strong and scalable infrastructure that is dynamic in nature and may grow to meet the increasing demands of the educational community.

 

Infrastructure and Connectivity:

 

All district school sites are connected to a powerful infrastructure that supports secure and reliable access to all appropriate and necessary information for staff, students and parents.  The district is connected via two DS3/ATM running at 40 MBs.  All elementary and middle schools are connected to SBC with a T1 connection and each of the 4 high schools are connected via two T1 lines.  This connectivity in a switched 100network environment with five Ethernet ports in every district classroom creates the access required to accomplish district objectives.

 

Access to Data:

 

The District is in the initial implementation phase of a new student information system (School Max) that significantly improves the accuracy and accessibility of all student records and related school and teacher data to more accurately target learning needs of students. In the classroom, the data that will be required to improve student achievement must be available using a large array of potential criteria, given the diverse nature of students. School Max software was chosen due to its versatility and ability to enable effective data disaggregation of achievement data taken from multiple measures and criteria.  The software will ensure accurate and timely data to all district employees in order to support data driven analysis and decision making it will also allow for standardized procedures for data collection that are consistent with requirements at the site district state and national levels.  The additional highlight of the School Max system is its ability to improve communication between student, teachers, support staff and parents.  The district will continue to move away from legacy computers and data systems in order to fully implement School Max at the desktop of every employee of the district.  Academic growth of students will clearly follow as learning materials and strategies can be targeted to specific learning needs.

 

Resources to Support at a World Class Technology System

 

Technology tools will be made available to students and teachers that will allow them to achieve the highest level of teaching and learning goals that is possible within the environment. Technology tools that are efficient dependable and easy to use will be the guarantee made by the district to all users of the Glendale Technology system. The support that teachers will receive will include tools that:

1.          Allow for preparation of instructional materials, with easy access to pre-evaluated tools and resources and allow for out of the box thinking to help kids learn. 

2.          Support the gathering of source materials from many sources of multiple media

3.          Teach through profiling of students and the class, all related to California State standards and all part of a system that supports cross-curriculum development.

4.          Support real-time classroom feedback that supports teacher understanding of who knows what and when.

5.          Support multiple learning styles in delivery and will support resources that can be accessible by both parents/guardians and students outside of the classroom that extend upon classroom instruction. 

6.          Provide a collaboration model to support all aspects of curriculum development and delivery

7.          Provide periodic, in addition to year-end, assessment and provide for multiple ways to access lessons.

 The system must be dependable and save teachers time, not cost them set-up time, reload time or time trouble-shooting the technology to be used in a given lesson. To achieve this, from the infrastructure perspective, the District must provide a reliable, scaleable and future-proof system that accommodates growth and new technologies, providing for support of multiple systems, different instructional settings and virtual classrooms. Access to community-based resources and home access are integral to the long-term success of the GUSD Technology Plan. GUSD is committed to standardization of infrastructure to support resource sharing, maintainability, enhancement and employing common protocols, while allowing multiple platforms to more closely accommodate all teaching and learning needs. The system will provide for tie-ins to the California State Information System (CSIS) and to the Digital California Project (DCP).

The ETIS department will facilitate a district-wide committee of staff members, comprised of representatives from every school in the District, community members, and members of the college/university community to continually monitor the strategic development of technology in the District.

 

Support

 

The district is committed to ensuring that the dependability of technology systems and tools is always maintained at the highest level of efficiency.  The district maintains 24-hour, 7-day, 365-day monitoring of all technology systems through both local and remote monitoring methods.  To further support the infrastructure the technology plan defines the support required to ensure such dependability and reliability in the districts hardware, software, connectivity, infrastructure, communications, hardware and related systems to ensure access at all times.

 

 

 

Security

 

The district considers the safety and security of the data, communication and technology systems to be a major consideration.   Administrative Regulation  AR 0440, District Technology and Planning - Guiding Principles, states that “the District will insure that adequate security measures are in place to safeguard network operations and limit access of students and staff as needed to specific data.”  To accomplish this the district protects the physical network and its data through a Novell Border Manager firewall and proxy service, through Novell’s Network Directory Services (NDS) for authentication of authorized system users and through SurfControl’s  software to protect the district network from inappropriate material.  Computer desktop workstations are protected by various levels of local security based upon the specific user, as is access to programs and data on the physical network.  Finally, the district is fully in compliance with CIPA (Children’s Internet Protection Act), maintaining an approved AUP (Acceptable Use Policy) and providing three-phase filtering of all data traffic into the district (Border Manager filtering methods of access, SurfControl’s filtering of inappropriate content, and an e-mail software filter, “Guinevere,” protecting against SPAM and virus attacks).

 

 

b.         Inventory

 

With student to computer ratios ranging from 2:1 at the Clark Magnet School, to 4:1 at the three comprehensive high schools, to a 8:1 at middle and elementary schools, the District is moving forward strongly to provide maximum access to state-of-the-art, effective technology for all students. All schools in the Glendale Unified School District are connected to the Internet and can use a variety of computer platforms to accomplish learning tasks.  This was accomplished using a combination of local general funds, modernization bond (Measure K), federal E-rate, and Digital High School funding.  The District connects to SBC via 2 DS-3 connections and connects to SBC Internet via a DS-3 ATM connection, both running at 40 MBs.  The network is a switched 100 network with multiple server systems.  The district has (28) T1 lines available for each OC-3 line and is currently operating at 66% use.  All are point-to-point connections. The (3) comprehensive high schools and (1) magnet high school are connected via (2) T-1 lines per school.  The (4) middle and (20) elementary schools are connected via (1) T1 line per school.  Several of the schools have wireless networks in place.  All classrooms in the district will have Internet connectivity, with 5 Internet ports per classroom, each running at 100 MBs, at the completion of planned modernization.  Currently 80% of the classrooms are connected.  An overview of the district infrastructure and classroom design are included in appendices A and D of this document.

 

c.                   Ongoing Technical Support

 

Recognizing that dependability is critical to the successful long-term implementation of a good technology system, the Glendale Unified School District is committed to supporting administrators, teachers and classified personnel in their use of technology.  To this end, the District has committed 4 full-time classified employees to general customer service to keep systems and the network running. In addition, the District has committed 6 positions occupied by current or former students who work on a part-time basis to support technology systems. The goal, as stated in the Plan, is to add staff on an incremental basis, in order to reach a support staff to computer ratio of 1 to 800.  The District is also committed to informing all technology support personnel regarding relevant and effective resources on the Web, such as the State-supported TechSETS project, which brings together information learned by other support personnel in the State to an information base which grows exponentially each month.  The final level of technical support is supplied by the partnerships that have been made with businesses and corporations in the Glendale Unified School District.  Examples of the high level of support relationship exist with Cisco, Pacific Bell and Apple among others.

 

Goals, Objectives and Benchmarks

III. Infrastructure

 

1) GOAL:                                Provide the necessary leadership, training, technical support services and resources to accomplish the vision at both district and site levels.

 

a) Objective:                Establish a Ratio of 1:800 hardware support staff to

computers

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Improve the ratio of support staff to computers to 1500:1 by adding additional staff.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Improve the ratio of support staff to computers to 1000:1 by adding additional staff.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Improve the ratio of support staff to computers to 800:1 by adding additional staff.

 

b) Objective:                Provide each teacher with a district-networked

workstation

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Provide 50% of teachers with a district-networked computer workstation.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Provide 75% of teachers with a district-networked computer workstation.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Provide 100% of teachers with a district-networked computer workstation.

 

c) Objective:                 Provide on site instructional support personnel to integrate technology into the curriculum

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Explore and determine methods or a model for providing instructional support personnel to integrate technology into the curriculum.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Based on the model or methods determined in year 1, develop and implement a training program for school-based personnel.  Begin training program.  Reach 50% of site staff.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Continue training program so that 100% of sites will have an instructional support staff member to integrate technology into the curriculum.

 

d) Objective:                Periodically adjust resources to meet needs of information systems, staffing levels and equipment obsolescence issues as identified by ongoing review and evaluation

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Determine baseline technology resources.  Determine appropriate equipment levels, staffing, etc. to support information systems

End of Year 2:

 

 

Evaluate and adjust equipment selection, inventories, and staffing to effectively support the information systems.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Evaluate and adjust equipment selection, inventories, and staffing to effectively support the information systems.

 

e) Objective:                Implement a training internship program to provide

technical support by students to lessen the need for more technicians without compromising data and

network security.

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Review current model used by ETIS and expand, adjust, or redevelop the training and distribution of services.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Expand the number of students eligible for and working within the program by 10% over the current program.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Expand the number of students and/or locations for student training and access to the internship program by 10% over the year 2 numbers.

           

c.         List of Benchmarks and Timeline For Implementing Planned Strategies and Activities.

 

Objectives, benchmarks and timeline can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

 

d.         Process To Monitor Benchmarks And Timeline

 

Evaluation data, person responsible, and plan modification process can be found in Section 7 on pages 51 – 82 of this document.

Back to the Top
 


6.  FUNDING AND BUDGET

 

GUSD has made a significant investment in order to provide students and teachers with technology tools and a highly capable infrastructure so they may be as effective as possible in increasing student achievement.  The five access points now available or to be available in each classroom connecting to a high speed infrastructure with a student to computer ratio of 1:4, 1:5 or 1:6 provides for the excellent foundation needed to utilize software and other computer related learning tools to maximize student learning.  The funding for infrastructure and computers has come from a variety of sources including a combination of local general funds, a modernization bond (measure K), federal E-rate, Digital High School and AB 2882 funding.  This provided the bulk of funding with local school resources invested in equipment and software as appropriate to the respective educational setting.  In the last five years the district has also invested in the creation of an educational technology department to be combined with information services for the most effective utilization of technology tools.  The ETIS department has also been housed in modernized facilities funded by supplementary grant dollars serving as the hub of development of infrastructure, acquisition of technology tools and partner in designating and delivering training.  This investment in the ETIS department has launched the district into a strong position of readiness to fully implement its technology program.

 

a.         Established and Potential Funding Resources

 

The district at its meeting of the Board of Education in December 2002 reaffirmed its commitment to technology by adopting a set of revised goals and objectives to be implemented over the next three years, (2003-2005).  To fully implement the Glendale technology plan the district intends to continue to utilize federal E-rate dollars.  The latest example of which is the $2,100,000 discount received for the 2002-2003 school year.  Nine of the district schools will benefit from remaining modernization dollars with Measure K funds providing for appropriate infrastructure and wiring up to classrooms.  During the three year life of this plan the district’s goal is to create district wide support for acquisition of funds and resources for technology development by continuing to review district standards and needs on a regular and planned basis.  This will include annual reviews of computer systems and software, the requirement for a support fee for all computer equipment purchases.  This will allow for the total cost of ownership from a standpoint of hardware support and maintenance to be funded over the life of the plan.  The fee will be adjusted as appropriate in years 2 and 3 should the fee be too high or too low.  In addition, in order to maximize grant and corporate funding the district will create a resource map so that all stakeholders may receive guidance.  In applying for such funds this resource map will enable all stakeholders to apply for available funds from a variety of sources.  This effort will be led by the grants office which will lead all stakeholders in the pursuit of grant opportunities, corporate sponsorships and donations. State and Federal grant sources will, of course, continue to be pursued. Finally and most importantly the district has committed to develop priorities and allocate resources to support technology implementation in curricular and business operations area.  Specifically this will enable the support of general fund dollars for district wide technology fund development.  The district intends, after development of the allocation for district wide technology, to publish the information to available stakeholders and intends to increase general fund support by approximately 10% given the escalating cost of technology and the growth of technology need to support teaching and learning objectives.  The characteristics of that program listed below.

 

·        Collaboration between home and school toward student success.

 

Goals and objectives of the Funding and Resource Section of the Technology Plan are listed below:

IV. Funding and Budget

 

1) GOAL:                                Create district-wide support for the acquisition of funds and resources for technology development.

 

a) Objective:                Update district standard computer systems and

software on a regular planned basis

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

The Superintendent will annually review and define the District standard for computer systems and software.

End of Year 2:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will annually review and define the District standard for computer systems and software.

End of Year 3:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will annually review and define the District standard for computer systems and software.

 

b) Objective:                Determine the validity of a “support fee” for all computer equipment purchases that is formula based and provides for funding of training and professional development (and hardware support)

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

The District Technology Committee will determine the scope and dollar amount of a “support fee” program for technology and make a recommendation to the Board of Education.

End of Year 2:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will review and adjust (as necessary) the “support fee” program

End of Year 3:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will review and adjust (as necessary) the “support fee” program.

 

c) Objective:                 Create a resource map to include existing funding, grants, corporate sponsors and donations

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

The District Technology Committee will develop a resource map of existing technology funding, grants, sponsors, and donation programs.

End of Year 2:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will update and publish the resource map.

End of Year 3:

 

 

The District Technology Committee will update and publish the resource map.

 

d) Objective:                Create a support system to secure grants and

donations that provide ongoing funding

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Develop a support system, based on the technology “resource map,” to seek funding sources for technology funding.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Evaluate and adjust the support system to more effectively secure technology funding.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Evaluate and adjust the support system to more effectively secure technology funding.

 

e) Objective:                Focus department staff and grants office resources to pursue grant funding opportunities, corporate sponsorships and donations

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Develop a comprehensive resource database and provide easy access to potential funding sources to schools and departments and train all District administrators in grant-writing strategies.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Develop a comprehensive investor packet or prospectus for donors to assure that the return on investment for donors is well established 

End of Year 3:

 

 

Working closely with partner corporations and companies, secure public and private funds as an exemplary technology district in the nation.

 

2) GOAL:                                Develop priorities and allocate resources to support

technology implementation in curricular and business operations.

 

a) Objective:                Provide general fund support for district-wide

technology development

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Determine and publish the baseline general fund budget support for district wide technology development.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Increase general fund support by 10% over the year one baseline allotment.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Increase general fund support by 10% over the year two baseline allotment

 

b) Objective:                Provide site-based personnel for support, staff development and integration of technology into the classroom

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Based on (Area III Infrastructure, Goal A, Strategy 3) develop a plan to provide site-based personnel to support staff development and integration of technology into the curriculum, determine costs and funding sources.

End of Year 2:

 

 

Fund a training program to prepare and support site-based instructional support personnel.  Reach 50% of sites.

End of Year 3:

 

 

Adjust funding levels to provide on-going site-based instructional support personnel.  Reach 100% of sites.

 

c) Objective:                 Collaborate within the K-16 continuum and with local, state and national foundations and businesses to maximize resources

 

BENCHMARKS

End of Year 1:

 

Determine resources, develop database, add use resource map.  Determine contact and support person/group in the District to manage and maintain resource map, database and contacts.

End of Year 2:

 

Update resource map, database and contact lists.

End of Year 3:

 

Update resource map, database and contact lists.

 

 

 

b.         Estimated Implementation Costs

 

Information Technology

Proposed Budget

 

 

Description

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

Connectivity

 

 

 

 

 

School Modernization and Data Infrastructure

$2,863,665

$4,500,000

$3,700,000

Data Systems

Student Information Systems

 

 

 

 

 

School Max – Student Information System

$450,115

0

0

 

Conversion to Oracle

$510,000

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COSTS

 

$3,813,770

$4,500,000

$3,700,000

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Funds

 

 

 

 

 

School Modernization -Measure K-

$2,863,665

$4,500,000

$3,700,000

 

Mega Item Block Grant

$950,115

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL FUNDS

 

$3,813,770

$4,500,000

$3,700,000

 

Educational Technology Department

Proposed Budget

 

Budget Category

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

 

 

 

 

1000

Certificated Teachers/Consultants

$266,079

$266,079

$266,079

2000

Classified/Clerical

$1,013,394

$1,013,394

$1,013,394

3000

Benefits

$266,165

$266,165

$266,165

4000

Books, Supplies, Materials

$210,252

$210,252

$210,252

5000

Leases, Repairs, Fees, Services

$385,000

$385,000

$385,000

7000

PERS Reduction

$100,372

$100,372

$100,372

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

$2,241,262

$2,241,262

$2,241,262

 

 

 

 

 

Source of funding

 

 

 

 

Educational Technology Department

 

 

 

            

General Fund

$893,865

$893,865

$893,865

            

Supplemental Grant

$1,347,397

$1,347,397

$1,347,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

$2,241,262

$2,241,262

$2,241,262

 

Curriculum Department

Professionl Development Costs

 

Budget Category

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

 

 

 

 

 

1000

Teachers/Consultants

$31,300

$35,000

$38,000

2000

Office & Classified Salaries

$1000

$1,500

$1,500

3000

Benefits

$0

$0

$0

4000

Supplies

$3,200

$3,500